By: Donovan Baker (4th Listener)
I got on the plane and pulled out my paperback copy of Baptized Atheist. The lady next to me immediately said, “I know David
Smalley. How do you like the book?”
Thinking I am sitting next to an atheist and we should have a
great ride talking about stuff, I still proceeded cautiously, because you just
never know. I asked, “Really? How do you know him?”
She replied, “He has a radio show.”
I said, “Yeah, he does! Do you listen to it too?”
“I have,” she replied, “but just some parts. I hear about it
through Focus on the Family.”
BINGO! I said, “I am a bit confused. How is that?” I was, of
course, aware of this. After all, I am the Fourth Listener.
She explained that they mention him and his radio show and have
discussed things that he has said and even hears exerts from the show. She then
asked me again about how I am enjoying the book.
I said, “It is a great book and
he took a similar route that I did, but his was much more researched. It tells all
about how David went out searching to be a better Christian.” I paused to let
that soak in for a second. “But, after lots of research, things began to not
make sense to him. He ends up finding out many things he was not being told and
then started discovering that certain things in the bible were actually disturbing
and contradictory. So he continued on his quest to find experts to help him understand
and give him good explanations for these things, but the answers were just not
there. Or I should say, they were either not there, or they turned out to not
really be good answers.” I looked right at her and said, “You know…’god works
in mysterious ways’ or ‘we can’t possibly understand his plan.’ Those are not
answers; those are things people say when they have no answer.”
She had a brief look of shock, then curiosity, and then it hit.
That glimmer of ‘I am going to save this poor soul’ hit her eyes. She asked,
“So which are you?” pointing to the book?
“Me? I am both. Baptized Roman Catholic and now an atheist.” At
this point we went through the usual are you sure you believed and I told her a
brief version of my attending many different churches, Sunday schools, getting
confirmed as a Catholic, and eventually ended up being a Born Again. I told her
how I felt really close to god and all of that. I explained that I just had too
many questions, so I then started reading about other religions and eventually
read their “holy” books and of course, the bible, 3 separate times. She seemed
somewhat satisfied with that (even though they never really are), and then
started asking me what was it that wasn’t being told or was not being answered.
Instead of telling my specific journey, I decided to take her on
David’s. I did this figuring if nothing else, she could read the book on her
iPad (that was in her lap with the Kindle app running) as confirmation of what
I have said, and use that text to go research it for herself. But for any of
this to happen, I still have to ensue some kind of doubt. We went through the
Osiris and Horus story and I explained there were a half a dozen of these like
stories predating the bible to my knowledge. She seemed determined that this is
just not true. When she said that she didn’t agree with that, a guy sitting in
front of us turned around briefly and looked at us both. She was kind of loud
when she talked and I was really keeping my voice down.
So we continued on though the usual items. We hit the flood with
her believing scientists say there really was a world flood. We discussed the
Grand Canyon and how there is no evidence of that ever happening and that she
should look that up again. She agreed to do that. We talked about how some
guy,recently, built an ark to prove it was real. So I pointed out the animals
would not fit in there, how is 7 people going to feed those animals, and still
shovel all that waste out that one window on top and questioned her on how did
these animals that are only one location specific get to those places. I said
for me, he just proved that could not have happened. We discussed evolution and
she had no real answer for that except that it can’t be true because she can’t
see us still evolving today. I tried to explain it to her by mentioning she had
a tail and how evolution doesn’t happen instantly with explanations of both,
but she was sure she was in the right.
I did convince her that any further research she does from now
on, should be done by scientists that have no dog in the race. She agreed that
it makes no sense to read articles by atheist (activist) scientists or
Christian scientists, if she truly wants to know the best answer without bias.
I learned early on, that if you are discussing a point that they
refuse to open their mind or consider, you move on. The goal is to find that
one or two things that hit home for that person. For me, that is what makes a
successful encounter. However, she mentioned she could not see evolution, so I
jumped ahead to David’s ‘Jaycee Dugard realization’. When I mentioned her name
(and was about to present it just like David did in the church) she said she
knew who that was. I recapped it anyway and then asked her if god watched. She
hardly hesitated and said “Most certainly he did.”
As I still let the thought sit there for a bit, I finally asked,
“And you are ok with this all-powerful being just watching and allowing that to
continue for 18 years?”
Then she said it. “Well, god has a plan.”
I replied, “Besides the fact that I already mentioned that ‘god
has a plan’ is not an answer, but more of an excuse to not deal with something,…please
tell me in what way is an 11 year old girl needed to be THAT abused and
mistreated for THAT long ever going to be part of a good plan? What could an 11
year old possibly due to deserve that under any circumstance?” I got my first, ‘I
don’t know’ with the real look of doubt.
We hit several other items from David’s book. She did completely
agree in the separation of church and state and that religion has no place in
government. Then things moved on to the bible itself. She said, “I just don’t
know how you can’t believe in the bible, because the message is so clear and
simple.”
I had so many ways to go about this, but I chose the path of how
the book became the bible, the whisper game, and the translations and
revisions. She agreed on how the New Testament was formed. She did not like it
when I asked her why she did not follow the New, New Testament of the Mormons.
She said that was a cult. I replied that is what they said about your new
testament when it started.
Then she told me Peter witnessed Jesus’s resurrection. I told
her to check that again. She looked for a while in her Kindle app'd bible and
when she showed it to me, I pointed out that he was clearly retelling the
information and that he was not a direct witness. This REALLY bothered her, and
it hit doubt number two. I know she will go check on that again.
I then hit her with the, ‘If it is so simple of a message’ then
why do thousands of sects believe different things, why do other religions
exist, why do they all argue with each other, ESPECIALLY those of the same
sect? Why do you and I read the same passage and we hear different words, like
your Peter reference. It is anything but simple. Why is this book such a
constant state of debate? She looked stunned and kept saying it was simple, and
I kept listing contradictions and things like the mama bears killing 42 kids in
Kings II. She never even knew that was in there. Then I asked her if she were
in Abraham’s situation and god asked her to kill her son, would she? She fought
it in her mind, dropped her head, and said no. I stopped, nodded, said “I
couldn’t either, even if I knew god was real.” No loving being of any power should
have to ever ask a parent to do that. Doubt number three.
We were quiet for a moment. Finally, she asked, “Why do I only
look at the negative side?” This is confirmation to me that they do realize it
is not perfect and they do have doubt in there somewhere.
My answer was, “When I was believer, I was not objective. I
always remembered the positive and good things. I blocked and ignored anything
that wasn’t supporting my belief. That is an incorrect way to view anyting in
life. Now, I look at it all objectively. When I speak with a believer about this
stuff, I know that they are likely to be coming from that same way of looking
at this stuff as well. You did not know about the bears killing children over
name calling, you don’t agree with slavery, killing your own son when asked is
not an option, what else have you not looked at objectively? That is for you to
discover. That is what I did; that is what David did. Read a little at a time
from the beginning. Deep down, you already know the real difference between
right and wrong in the world. Consider what you read and make your decisions
based on that.”
We spent the rest of the trip discussing where we were from and
the usual warm wishes for the Holidays. She said Merry Christmas and I said
Happy Holidays with a wink and we both laughed. The entire thing was very nice.
After letting her go ahead of me to get off the plane, the guy
in front of us was holding back in his seat. As I went by he grabbed my arm, smiled,
and said, “Dude, you killed that.” I smiled back and said thanks.
12 comments:
Your experience is a great illustration of how to effectively reason with someone of a mystic mentality; by being polite and tactical. The same way most of them try to manipulate unbelievers. It simply amazes me to hear my mother tell me in such a cordial manner that I need help from the church or I'm in danger of hell. It's also weird because I used to share that exact mentality towards others, and it's like interacting with a former version of my own personality. Reassures me of how much I've changed positively.
This past christmas my grandma was talking to me about my unbelief and I was politely explaining the concepts that always troubled me as a child and developling years. About killing anyone god (state authorities) deems as evil, or the story of Jacob and his mother/cousin Rachel, selfishly deceiving Esau and Isaac in order to get the birthright of savorial lineage. Or that the secular humanist will burn in hell while the scumbag that accepts jesus on his deathbed inherits eternal bliss. Or sacrifice your children if god (state authorities) tells you to. Or that god would torture me just to win a who has the bigger dick wager between god and satan. Or that the first 3 commandments aren't: no murder, no stealing, and no lying. But by far the thing that always troubled me the worst was the idea of no personal responsibilty for your actions. Someone like Carl Sagan, hell. Someone like Lindsay Lohan (if she truly accepted jeebus in her heat), heaven. There were always so many things that conflicted with my naturally self-realized moral concepts. I was so indoctrinated, I didn't wake up till my mid 20s.
I get very angry at overly religious people, and their thinking, but then I realize I used to be one, and it wasn't someone making fun of me that made my mind change about reality. It was ideas from people that are obsessed with reality and equality that penetrated my thick skull of religious dogma. Arguments that stand on the authority of nature, not the self-supposed 'authority' of mankind.
tl,dr
Good story. I never thought I would see the shift from superstition that we are seeing today.
I don't think it's going to work, but that was a very good try. Btw, the Horus and Osiris thing, is that from zeitgeist? It has been refuted already by many people, here's a link http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/zeitgeist/
Met Christian woman on plane.
Planted seed of doubt.
Guy in front thought he kicked ass.
the horus thing is not just from zeitgeist.... There are plenty of books you can checkout from your local library about Egyptian religion.
"I had a conversation with a Christian, and it went like all conversations with Christians go." Wow, riveting story.
Is there any room in your worldview for a non-idiot who is very aware of all the apparent inconsistencies, but still wants to see the whole set of inconsistencies be resolved with Jesus at the center?
@Brian Herling For the vast majority of atheists, sure. Just understand that this now means you're basing your faith on what you've been taught through your culture. As with any human experience, you're aspiring to greatness, with inspiration coming from other humans. Is there room in your worldview to accept what inspires you are the words and actions of people -- just people -- written down over a very long period of time by different generations?
I have read it a few places. Zeitgeist did not come to mind. I was not a fan of it. I liked the idea, but not the research or conclusion jumping. I'm still not convinced it is incorrect, so I may have to take time and look it up again. I could have picked any of those story lines anyway.
@MES I'm sorry it's taken forever for me to get back to you, but I hope you eventually read this.
I am not trying to resolve these conflicts solely by relying on what the broader culture tells me. My beliefs rest solely at the convergence of what the Bible, Culture, my own reflection, personal prayer, friendships, the broader Christian culture, the global culture, Science, and (rarely) personal interactions with God.
All of those things should agree for me to believe something. If they do not (for any reason), it is merely a sign that I need to pray, think, reflect, listen, dialogue, meditate, and read more.
It's an ongoing process.
Fantastic read. It may not instantly "convert" them, but experiences like this truly shake a theist to their core. Chances are, they will tell themselves that "god sent you to challenge and strengthen their faith," and they may even believe it. But you have made some serious cracks in the foundation of their belief system, whether they admit it or not. Even if they never reach the point of fully renouncing their faith, I believe you have done the world a great service by helping that person to become that much less fanatical.
Post a Comment